Gimpshop is basically a rewrite of the XML files that generate the menus to be more Photoshop-like, and a shortcut file to remap the shortcuts to match Photoshop and a script that puts all of the Gimp’s windows in one big window.Īccording to most online users, most of them have been working on Linux and with that, they prefer Gimp to Photoshop. Just for the reason that Photoshop is used in commercial areas whereas, Gimp is used at homes or for very small-scale jobs. A long-time Photoshop user might feel weird or absurd if at all asked to work with Gimp. It may happen, that the same things in Photoshop might have a different name in the case of Gimp but they perform practically the same work in both cases. An image made in Photoshop and that in Gimp will be equally fine but still, one can make out the best out of the two.Īlthough Gimp incorporates multiple features of Photoshop, we can’t tag Gimp as a clone of Photoshop in any case. This is still not available in Gimp but brushes are still there. Photoshop also boasts about its feature, which provides resizable brushes for image enhancement.
If that’s what Gimp is supposed to do, then it would not be desirable to compare Gimp with Photoshop since even though they have almost the same applications, still, the field of use is entirely different and Gimp can’t be shifted from home use to commercial use unless it removes some of its drawbacks which have been mentioned by some Photoshop and Gimp users as well. They don’t plan to use it in commercial areas, but only at home. One drawback that was seen from the point of view of certain Gimp users was its slowness to open large files and to apply filters, the unintuitive tools that accompany it, and it’s very visible bad quality of text and lines/shapes Despite this, one can’t deny the overall quality that Gimp provides to home users. This is an invaluable feature that greatly increases productivity and speed of use in the case of Gimp. Adding these keybinds is just as easy: bring up the menu, move the mouse over a particular feature and press the desired keystroke combination. Gimp added the ability to attach a key binding to any menu accessible feature.Īlmost every single feature in Gimp can be attached to a particular keystroke combination (any combination of alt, control, shift, and another key can form a key binding). In Photoshop, certain commands had their own built-in keyboard shortcuts, which allowed users to quickly accomplish a certain basic task. Another area where Gimp stands out is in its key binding support.
In addition, Gimp supports filters written in the Perl scripting language (using the gimp-Perl scripting module). The wide variety of Gimp filters has allowed us to create some wonderful and interesting tiles. The additional filters that come with Gimp are unique and great for adding interesting features. The built-in set of filters match up to Photoshop’s initial version. One of Gimp’s strong points is its filter capabilities. On the positive side, it is heard that CMYK support is planned in the next coming version of Gimp i.e.
Gimp photoshop clone professional#
This is one of the main reasons why the Gimp doesn’t hold much support in professional and commercial areas. All of Gimp’s operations currently take place in RGB mode, where all color values are stored as fractions of red, blue, and green. One of the areas where Photoshop still holds an edge is its support for CMYK. There are similar sets of built-in filters also in fact, filters are one of Gimp’s biggest features. The Layer features and masking which are also present in Photoshop are also very similar in the case of Gimp. In terms of tools, the Gimp matches tool for tool against the most current version of Photoshop. Now, the Gimp stands at version 1.2, reproduces the majority of Photoshop’s features, and offers a few more to boot. 0.99.5 which was indeed a great improvement from its earlier version.
Unfortunately, the first version of Gimp i.e., (0.5, I believe) was far from what one could have expected.Ī couple of months after that, Gimp released its new version i.e. Learning a new interface is painful for anybody, but it seems to be simply unacceptable for the graphics artist. But, Photoshop has a couple of advantages over Gimp and they are that Photoshop has “patented features” and “a common interface”. It costs around $600 these days and so as far as price is concerned, Photoshop loses out on this area. The hefty wad of cash one has to sacrifice to actually buy an authorized copy of Photoshop is a big prize indeed. For personal use, the Gimp will do everything and more but if you need a bitmap editor so you can create or edit images for commercial printing, you don’t want the Gimp, you want Photoshop as the Gimp lacks most of the required commercial features. On the other hand, people who use Photoshop, only use a fraction of its capabilities.
0 kommentar(er)
